Six things you don't know about Victoria Memorial

Six things you don't know about Victoria Memorial

December 2, 2015

The Victoria Memorial of Kolkata, officially ‘The All India Victoria Memorial Hall’, is the city’s number one tourist attraction. In his book Calcutta’s Edifice: The Buildings of a Great City, Brian Paul Bach writes, “Probably no other structure is currently called upon as often to serve as a symbol of Calcutta.” Victoria Memorial attracts tourists by the thousands every day and yet, there is much about the monument that even Kolkatans are unaware of. Here are six things about the Victoria Memorial that most people don’t know.

Victoria Memorial (


Let’s begin with origin stories, shall we? In 1767, Kolklata (or Calcutta, as it was then called) had two jails, one in Lalbazar and one in Burrabazar. One was for petty crimes, and one for serious offences. The new Presidency Jail was built where the Victoria Memorial now stands, in 1778. Locals referred to the place as ‘Harrinbari.’ Now ‘harrin’ means ‘deer’ in Bengali and ‘bari’ means ‘house’, so the ‘deer-house’, tradition says, was a hunting box belonging to Siraj-ud-Daulah. It could also have been an enclosed space for captive animals – the Nawab’s zoo.

The conditions inside Presidency Jail were atrocious and families of inmates were often living inside with them. There was a tank or a small pond in the centre of the prison. One of the most famous inmates of the old Presidency Jail was James Augustus Hickey, who started India’s first newspaper, Hickey’s Bengal Gazette. The Presidency Jail eventually moved to Alipore in 1906, and the old structure was demolished to make way for the Victoria Memorial. Frederick Fiebig managed to take a photograph of Presidency Jail as part of his ‘Panoramic Views of Calcutta’ collection, but I can’t find the damned thing on the internet!


Money for the Victoria Memorial came from the people of India. Queen Victoria died in 1901, and the initial proposal was to have several small memorials to her all over India, but Lord Curzon, the then Viceroy, was having none of it. He wanted one grand monument, one that British hubris proclaimed to be a rival to the Taj Mahal of Agra, and one that would act as a museum, containing the best of India and of the British in India. Donations were called for from all over the country, and some 76,00,000 rupees ultimately went into the construction. Now, it is entirely my personal opinion, but asking for money so you can have a great big monument for your dead Queen, seems somewhat strange, even undignified. The British were bleeding India dry; they could have at least dug into their own pockets for this. To be fair, the British Government did partly fund the memorial; the vast majority of Indian donors were princes and the like, who would have even jumped through hoops to impress their colonial masters. How different is it now when Indians are exhorted by television commercials to donate money for a very large statue of Sardar Patel? Sardar Patel is ‘one of us,’ so to speak, and a great freedom fighter. But back then, the Queen was one of us as well, in a manner of speaking. She was the Empress of India, wasn’t she?

Victoria Memorial (


Okay, that headline is what is called ‘clickbait.’ We all know that Lord Curzon commissioned the Victoria Memorial and that Vincent Esch was the architect who designed it (incidentally, Vincent Esch was also the architect of the much less glamourous Temple Chambers building, adjacent to the High Court). But who did the actual building? That would be the Kolkata-based firm Martin & Co. Martin & Co. was a partnership between Sir Thomas Acquinas Martin and the Bengali, Sir Rajen Mookerjee. Sir Thomas had originally suggested that the firm be called Martin & Mookerjee, but Sir Rajen refused; a native name would make getting European orders very difficult. Martin & Co. was originally only supposed to build the foundations, but their work was so impressive that they were given the task of building the entire monument. The Victoria Memorial is what got Sir Rajen his knighthood. It cost 7,000,000 rupees to build and used some 200,000 cubic feet of marble. Martin & Co. set up stone quarries in Makrana in Rajasthan to procure this marble. Incidentally, Makrana marble is what the Taj Mahal in Agra is also made of.


The government of Bengal engaged in some serious decolonisation after 1947. Colonial statues from all over Kolkata were removed and their places were taken by Indian ones. Most statues were sent into the wilderness of the Latbagan in Barrackpore, but several were relocated to the Victoria Memorial’s garden. Among them was the statue of General Sir James Outram by John Henry Foley RA. The statue was originally at the crossing of Park Street and Chowringhee. It was unveiled on May 23, 1874 at 6.45 am by Lord Francis Napier. It was replaced in 1958 by a statue of Mahatma Gandhi. In the late 1970s, that had to be moved too to accommodate digging for Kolkata’s Metro Railway. The statue of Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first Prime Minister was installed at the same spot in 1989. That too must now be moved thanks to damage to its base. But look closely at Outram’s statue and you will be reminded of a famous Kolkata landmark.

In the middle of the Shyambazar five-point crossing stands a statue of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose on horseback. The sculptor was the Marathi, Nagesh Yoglekar. It was installed in 1969. It is very clearly a copy of the Outram statue and a very second rate copy at that. My father remembers the controversy the Netaji statue caused when it was installed, with people wondering why such an ugly statue was the best that could be found to honour the city’s greatest hero. Both statues are in less than brilliant condition, though. Netaji’s statue is surrounded by ugly wiring and is terribly badly lit. Outram’s statue has sustained significant damage over the years. The horse’s reins, supposed to be in Outram’s left hand, have broken off as has the sword that was supposed to be in Outram’s right hand.

Sir James Outram (Robert Freidus/


Actually there are two sets of mysterious writings that you encounter at the Victoria Memorial. The first is on the columns near the gate outside: ‘VRI.’

What does ‘VRI’ stand for? ‘Victoria Regina Imperatrix.’ What does that mean? Victoria Queen Empress. But isn’t that a redundancy? Not unless the same person is the Queen of two different countries. That can happen when two royal houses are merged through marriage or when your people sneak into a foreign country pretending to be a benign trading body and eventually come to control the entire country, making you its Empress. So, Victoria, Queen of England and Empress of India. Now, what about that second piece of writing? That is a curious phrase found above the entrance to that Victoria Memorial Hall: ‘Dieu Et Mon Droit.’

‘Dieu et mon droit’ is a Latin phrase which means ‘god and my right,’ which is the motto of the United Kingdom, outside of Scotland. First used as a battle-cry by Richard I and subsequently adopted by Henry V, ‘dieu et mon droit’ is probably a reference to a monarch’s divine right to rule. This is the British coat of arms and apart from the Victoria Memorial, it can still be seen on only two other buildings in Kolkata. In most places, it has been replaced by the Lion Capital of Ashoka, the standard of India.


Anyone who has photographed extensively in Kolkata has run into a ‘Photography Prohibited’ board somewhere or the other. You can blame the Japanese for that one. You see, when WWII was raging, there was a very real risk that someone would take photographs of Kolkata’s landmarks and send it to the Japanese Air Force who would then bomb it to smithereens! They did bomb the Khidderpore docks, the Manicktala market (although that bomb turned out to be a dud) and the Dunlop tyre factory in Sahagunj (although that bomb landed in the market adjacent to the factory). The British Government in Kolkata prohibited all photography of monuments, but then a giant hunk of marble can be seen quite easily from the sky, especially on a full moon night. The solution? Paint it black!!! The Victoria Memorial is said to be the British Raj’s answer to the Taj Mahal. There are legends about a black Taj Mahal, but that is a mostly unsubstantiated rumour. The black Victoria Memorial, though, is very real, or at least, was, for a short period of time in 1943.

I could also tell you that the Angel of Victory, atop the main dome is a wind vane and that it really does turn, but surely, that is common knowledge. There is, however, one more secret related to the Victoria Memorial, but I’ll save that one for another post.

Victoria Memorial (


This blog by Deepanjan Ghosh appeared in the website, The Concrete Paparazzi on November 23, 2015

Lead image:

< Back to List

Comments (0)
Post a Comment Comments Moderation Policy
Name:    Email:
Security Code:
(Please enter the security code shown above)

Comments and Moderation Policy encourages open discussion and debate, but please adhere to the rules below, before posting. Comments or Replies that are found to be in violation of any one or more of the guidelines will be automatically deleted.

  • Personal attacks/name calling will not be tolerated. This applies to comments or replies directed at the author, other commenters or repliers and other politicians/public figures. Please do not post comments or replies that target a specific community, caste, nationality or religion.

  • While you do not have to use your real name, any commenters using any writer's name will be deleted, and the commenter banned from participating in any future discussions.

  • Comments and replies will be moderated for abusive and offensive language.


© 2017 Maa Mati Manush About Us  |  Contact   |   Disclaimer   |   Privacy Policy   |   Site Map